Legal Opinion

State v. Lewis

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1990No. S-2544PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURKE, Justice.

This is an appeal from consolidated eminent domain and inverse condemnation cases. The question presented is whether the state is entitled to a new trial on the amount of just compensation required for the taking of an abutting landowner’s right of access to the Richardson Highway. We hold that the superior court abused its discretion in denying the state’s motion for a new trial, because the jury verdict is internally inconsistent.

I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

In 1969, the state condemned a strip of land bisecting an eighty-acre parcel owned by William and Geraldine Lewis in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. HammerAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Dash v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State v. DoyleAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Triangle, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Babinec v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. 8,960 Square Feet, More or Less v. State, Department of Transportation & Public FacilitiesAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Borgen v. a & M MOTORS, INC.Alaska Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Suh Joon Yang v. Chun Young YooAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Keener v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. McCubbins v. State, Department of Natural Resources, Division of Parks & RecreationAlaska Supreme Court · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API