Legal Opinion
Babinec v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided July 20, 1973No. 1539PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOOCHEVER, Justice.
The instant appeal arises out of an eminent domain proceeding in which the State of Alaska condemned and acquired a fee simple interest in certain private property belonging to Edward M. Babinec and Martha L. Babinec 1 for the purpose of realigning and improving a highway. On this appeal the Babinecs claim as error various superior court orders, rulings and instructions, in particular, the manner in which the court regulated valuation testimony. Ultimately, the Babinecs challenge the amount of compensation awarded them by the jury.
Prior to the condemnation, the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Territory of Hawaii v. AdelmeyerHawaii Supreme Court · 1961
- Dash v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- Ketchikan Cold Storage Company v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. BoyerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
- Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. CaudillCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. DoyleAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- United States v. 8.41 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. 8.41 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situated in Orange County, State of Texas, and Kww Associates and Unknown Owners, United States of America v. 5.00 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situated in Orange County, State of Texas, and Firestone Tire and Rubber Company, United States of America v. 6.90 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situated in Orange County, State of Texas, and Firestone Tire and Rubber Company and Unknown OwnersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Gerstein v. AxtellAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. Alaska Continental Development Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.