Legal Opinion

Borgen v. a & M MOTORS, INC.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 2012No. S-14073PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Senior Justice.

The main issue presented in this case is whether under the Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Act a misrepresentation by a seller of the model year of a used motor home is subject to a defense that the misrepresentation was made in good faith. We answer in the negative because the Act clearly implies that unknowing affirmative misrepresentations of material facts will give rise to liability, and substantial authority from other jurisdictions that have similar statutes confirms this view.

I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Robert Borgen bought a used Travelaire…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc. v. Ellerman Lines, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Marshall v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Panag v. Farmers Ins. Co. of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Pennington v. SingletonTexas Supreme Court · 1980

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In re Gen. Motors LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  2. Merdes & Merdes, P.C. v. Leisnoi, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Conley v. Alaska Communications Systems Holdings, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Deloycheet, Inc. v. Beach (In re Beach)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Alaska · 2017
  5. Government Employees Insurance Co. v. GonzalezAlaska Supreme Court · 2017

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API