Legal Opinion

Dolkart v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided July 26, 2006No. 05-05-00934-CRPublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice WRIGHT.

Jane Lynn Dolkart appeals her conviction for aggravated assault. After the jury found her guilty, it assessed pumshment at two years’ confinement, probated for five years, and a $1000 fine. In eight issues, appellant contends: (1) the evidence is legally and factually insufficient to support her conviction; (2) her right to a unam-mous verdict was violated under both the United States and Texas Constitutions; (3) the trial court erred by allowing certain expert witness testimony; (4) the trial court erred by precluding defense counsel from questioning appellant…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  3. Ngo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  4. Saxton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. Richardson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Landrian v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
  2. Dobbins v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007
  3. Phillip Wayne Griffis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2014
  4. In the Matter of I.L., a Juvenile, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2012
  5. Christopher Allen Gillette v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2014

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API