Legal Opinion

Halvorsen v. Pacific County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1945No. 29465PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrady, J.

This action was brought by M. E. Halvorsen and Gina Halvorsen, husband and wife, against the county of Pacific and the state of Washington to secure a decree to the effect that they were the owners in fee simple of the land described in their complaint, and that neither of the defendants had any right, title, or interest in or to the property. The defendants answered separately, the state of Washington praying that it be adjudged that it was the owner of the land in fee simple and that none of the other parties to the action had any right, title, or interest therein. Pacific county in its…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gasaway v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. State v. LockeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Strand v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  4. State v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Franklin County v. CarstensWashington Supreme Court · 1912

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kobayashi v. ZimringHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Washington State Grange v. BrandtCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  3. Ohm v. Clear Creek Drainage DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Washington State Grange v. BrandtCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  5. Wingard v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1945

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API