Legal Opinion

Devine v. Griffenhagen

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided February 24, 1940No. 195PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HINCKS, District Judge.

The complaint in this case was filed December 16, 1939, and process immediately issued. On January 9, 1940, counsel for the defendants filed (1) an appearance stating “Kindly enter our appearance for all defendants in the above entitled action”, (2) a motion for more particular statement, and (3) a motion to dismiss or to quash return of service of summons upon the ground that personal service was not obtained upon the defendants.

The plaintiff contends that by filing the appearance set forth above the defendants waived right to object to the jurisdiction of the court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pollard & Pickett v. DwightSupreme Court of the United States · 1808
  2. Carter v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
  3. Grable v. KillitsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
  4. Prudential Ins. v. McKeeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fahey v. O'Melveny & Myers Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco v. O'Melveny & MyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
  2. Canaday v. Superior CourtSupreme Court of Delaware · 1955
  3. Simms v. MASON'S STORES, INC.(NC-1)Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  4. D. W. Onan & Sons, Inc. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Sadler v. Pennsylvania Refining Co.District Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API