Legal Opinion
Sadler v. Pennsylvania Refining Co.
District Court, W.D. South Carolina
Decided May 29, 1940No. C. A. 90PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HENRY H. WATKINS, District Judge.
The one issue to be decided in this case is that of jurisdiction. The point was made by plaintiff’s counsel that this objection had been waived by defendant’s answering to the merits, but this contention was not urged in argument and is without merit. Rule 12 of “Civil Procedure of the District Courts of the United States,” Subdivision b, 28 Ú.S.C.A. following section 723c, outlines what constitutes waiver in such cases and the exceptions thereto. The case of Schlaefer v. Schlaefer et al., 112 F.2d 177, decided by the Court of Appeals for the District of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- People's Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Goldey v. Morning NewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. SpratleySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Wabash Western Railway v. BrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- David Neifeld v. Meyer Steinberg. David Neifeld v. Meyer SteinbergCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- Blank v. BitkerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
- Seymour M. Chase v. Pan-Pacific Broadcasting, Inc. Miko Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- D. W. Onan & Sons, Inc. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1947
- Keil Lock Co. v. Earle Hardware Manufacturing Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.