Legal Opinion

Wagner v. Kellogg

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1892PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Gartner, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiffs bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

Plaintiffs brought suit in attachment against the defendants before a justice of the peace. The writ was returnable February 14, 1891, at 9 o’clock A. M. The only question presented by the record is, should the plaintiffs have been nonsuited for failure to appear within one hour after the time mentioned in the writ? The return of the justice to the writ of certiorari is as follows:

“And I also do certify, at the time and place certified of the return of said attachment said parties did not appear personally before me; but upon 'my own motion, and also.the written request of the plaintiffs, the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hodges v. BaggMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sager v. Jung & Sons Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  2. Everett Ry., Light & Power Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1916
  3. Nagele-Kelly Manufacturing Co. v. HannakMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Scott v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Nelson v. HillenMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API