Nelson v. Hillen
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Mecosta; Palmer, J. Assumpsit in justice’s court by Murie Nelson against John Hillen. Defendant removed the case, after judgment for plaintiff, by certiorari to the circuit court. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.
On the 16th of April, A. D. 1909, Murie Nelson, as plaintiff, began a suit against John Hillen, as defendant, before Merton Hunt, a justice of the peace of the township of Fork, in the county of Mecosta, which was returnable April 24, 1909, at 10 o’clock a. m. This summons was personally served on the defendant Hillen at the township of Fork, in Mecosta county, on the 16th day of April, 1909, by William J. Dewey, a deputy sheriff. After the defendant was served with the summons, he consulted his counsel, whereupon and oh the 23d day of April, 1909, he filed with the justice a written motion…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mahoney v. Detroit Street Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Wagner v. KelloggMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Appleman v. HahnMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Marquette & Pacific Rolling Mill Co. v. MorganMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Monroe v. ReynellsMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.