Legal Opinion

Hodges v. Bagg

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1890PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Reilly, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCahill, J.

Plaintiffs sued defendant in an action of assumpsit before Overton L. Kinney, one of the justices, of the peace in and for the city of Detroit, by summons returnable August 16, 1889. On the return-day the justice rendered a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs for $85.20 damages and $1.50 costs. The defendant took a special appeal to the circuit court, alleging the following errors in the judgment of the justice:

1. That the justice, upon a failure of the plaintiffs to appear when said case was called, rendered a judgment of nonsuit against the plaintiffs.

2. That the said justice erred in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hickey v. HinsdaleMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Chapman v. FloydSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
  3. Clark v. HolmesMichigan Supreme Court · 1844
  4. Weaver v. LammonMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Petrie v. KarschSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nagele-Kelly Manufacturing Co. v. HannakMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Wagner v. KelloggMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Weiss-Kemnitz Co. v. EhlertMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  4. HBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API