Legal Opinion
In Re Hill
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California
Decided November 27, 2000No. 14-52251PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum re Confirmation of Plan
ALAN JAROSLOVSKY, Bankruptcy Judge.
Debtor Jill Hill has minimal assets, all of which are exempt. She has filed a Chapter 13 plan which provides for payment in full of three credit card debts which Hill incurred using her mother’s credit cards. The other unsecured debts are separately classified and are to be paid nothing, which is the amount they would receive if this were a Chapter 7 case. The Chapter 13 trustee has objected to the plan. He argues that the plan discriminates unfairly between creditors.
This dispute is governed by § 1322(b)(1) of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McDonald v. Sperna (In Re Sperna)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Spokane Railway Credit Union v. Gonzales (In Re Gonzales)District Court, E.D. Washington · 1994
- In Re BurnsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1998
- In re PatinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 1995
3Cited by8 opinions
- Meyer v. Hill (In Re Hill)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Meyer v. Renteria (In Re Renteria)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- In re RiveraUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2012
- In Re HillUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Florida · 2001
- Aaron R. BrownUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.