Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Burns

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California

Decided March 10, 1998No. 19-00400PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

LOUISE DeCARL ADLER, Chief Judge.

Raymond S. Burns and Lisa M. LaVera (“Debtors”) oppose the Chapter 13 trustee’s motion to modify their confirmed plan and have asked the Court instead to confirm their modified plan dated January 26, 1998. The Debtors’ modified plan seeks to put the non-priority, unsecured portion of the support claim by the County of San Diego in a separate class, paying the claim in full while other unsecured creditors receive 0% on their unsecured claim. Because this Court believes that the facts urged here are not substantively different than those urged…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Amfac Distribution Corp. v. Wolff (In Re Wolff)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  2. McDonald v. Sperna (In Re Sperna)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  3. Spokane Railway Credit Union v. Gonzales (In Re Gonzales)District Court, E.D. Washington · 1994
  4. In Re WarnerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1989
  5. In Re GradyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re HillUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 2000
  2. In Re HillUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Florida · 2001
  3. In Re BlackstoneUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2001
  4. In Re GrayUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 2001
  5. In Re MaitenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API