Legal Opinion

In re Patin

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California

Decided June 13, 1995No. Bankruptcy No. 94-12623PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

ALAN JAROSLOVSKY, Bankruptcy Judge.

The Internal Revenue Service has objected to the debtor’s Chapter 13 plan because it proposes to separately classify tax penalties and pay nothing on them, while paying 100% to other unsecured claims. While the issue does not seem to be completely resolvable based on briefs, the court will do as much as it can.

The court first notes that section 1322(a)(2) of the Bankruptcy Code requires that a Chapter 13 plan must provide for all priority claims to be paid in full. Section 507(a)(8)(G) provides that tax penalties are entitled to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re Burden, Wilfred, H., A/K/A Burden, Wilfred, H., Jr., T/a Burden's Janitorial Service & Supply Company v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re HillUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API