Legal Opinion

Meyer v. Renteria (In Re Renteria)

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 4, 2012No. BAP No. EC-11-1502-MkPaD. Bankruptcy No. 11-10636PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MARKELL, Bankruptcy Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Michael H. Meyer, chapter 131 trustee (“Trustee”), appeals the bankruptcy court’s order confirming the plan of debtor Amanda K. Renteria (“Renteria”). The Trastee objected to the plan because the plan separately classified and proposed to pay in full, with 10% interest, one unsecured claim. That claim was a consumer debt guaranteed by Renteria’s mother.

Renteria was less generous with her other debts; her plan proposed to pay little or nothing on account of any other unsecured claims. The court overruled the Trustee’s objection, and confirmed the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Barnhart v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Sosa v. Alvarez-MachainSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Corley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Chickasaw Nation v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. In Re Jonathan Barnes Leavitt, Debtor. Jonathan Barnes Leavitt v. Carlos SotoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hopkins v. Asset Acceptance LLC (In Re Salgado-Nava)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. In re RiveraUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2012
  3. Miner v. JohnsDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2018
  4. Carrión v. Rivera (Rivera)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2013
  5. In re RussellUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API