Legal Opinion

Winger v. Elmore

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 21, 1936No. Cov. No. 9787PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for injuries sustained in a collision between his automobile and one driven by defendant, alleging that the collision was proximately caused by the defendant’s negligence. Defendant, answering, denied he was negligent, and interposed a cross-complaint alleging that the collision was proximately caused by the negligence of plaintiff. The trial took place before a jury, which decided in effect that the accident was due to the concurrent negligence of both parties, and that therefore neither was entitled to damages. Judgment was entered…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fishman v. SilvaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. Dougherty v. EllingsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Hill v. PeresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Bullock v. Western Wholesale Drug Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Wise v. StottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Merlino v. Fresno MacAroni Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API