Legal Opinion
Bullock v. Western Wholesale Drug Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 26, 1928No. Docket No. 5101PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VALENTINE, J., pro tem.
These two actions were brought by husband and wife for damages resulting from an automobile accident. The facts are further stated in the opinion. The two cases were consolidated for trial by stipulation.
At the conclusion, of the taking of testimony the trial court, upon motion of defendants, directed the jury to find a verdict for defendants, and from the judgment entered upon such verdict in each ease the plaintiffs take this appeal.
The appellants contend that the proximate cause of the accident was the negligence of the defendant Crittenden, who was driving the truck…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Moss v. H. R. Boynton Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
- Finkle v. TaitCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Rowe v. Southern California Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1906
- Gary South Coast Agency v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. KaramanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Fischer v. KeenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Lavin v. FereiraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Flores v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1936
- Gibb v. CleaveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.