Legal Opinion
O'Keefe v. Brenner
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 14, 1966No. Civ. A. No. 1041-65Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JACKSON, District Judge.
This is a civil action to obtain a patent under 35 U.S.C. § 145. Upon review of the evidence and briefs in the case, the Court finds for plaintiffs who are entitled to receive a patent for the invention set forth in Claims 12, 13 and 17 of application Serial No. 161,325, filed November 4, 1959, entitled “Water Conditioning Method and Apparatus”.
Pursuant to Rule 52(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. This is an action under 35 U.S.C. § 145 in which plaintiffs seek an order…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Ray-O-Vac Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- California Research Corporation v. David L. Ladd, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
- Application of Nathan R. ClineCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.