Scott v. Donnelly
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Commissioner.
The plaintiffs bring this action on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated against the defendants as the appointed, qualified, and acting members of the North Dakota Potato Development Commission, organized by virtue of Chapter 4-10A, N.D.C.C. The relief sought is a declaration of the rights, status, and other legal relations of the plaintiffs with respect to Chapter 4-10A, N.D.C.C., and a determination of the constitutionality of the chapter and various sections thereof and for such further relief as the court may deem proper.
The first challenge to the…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- C. v. Floyd Fruit Co. v. Florida Citrus CommissionSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
- State Ex Rel. Graham v. EnkingIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
- Menz v. CoyleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
- Miller v. Michigan State Apple CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
- Louisiana State Department of Agriculture v. SibilleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- City of Spokane v. Spokane Police GuildWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Dukesherer Farms, Inc v. Director of the Department of AgricultureMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
- Ralston Purina Company v. HagemeisterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
- Trinity Medical Center v. North Dakota Board of NursingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- PW Enterprises, Inc. v. North Dakota (In re Racing Services, Inc.)District Court, D. North Dakota · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.