Legal Opinion

Ralston Purina Company v. Hagemeister

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1971No. Civ. 8674PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUTZ, Chief Justice.

The plaintiff brings this action against the defendants as the duly appointed, qualified, and acting members of the North Dakota Poultry Improvement Board, organized under the provisions of Chapter 4-13, North Dakota Century Code. The relief which the plaintiff seeks is a declaration of its rights, status, and legal liabilities and as to the constitutionality of Chapter 4-13, North Dakota Century Code, and certain sections thereof, and for such other and further relief as may be just and proper.

The Poultry Improvement Act was adopted by the Legislative Assembly as…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Lee v. DelmontSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  3. Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. v. JohannesonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
  4. McDougall v. LuederIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Langer v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. County of Stutsman v. State Historical Society of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Southern Valley Grain Dealers Ass'n v. Board of County CommissionersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. BrownNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  4. North Dakota Council of School Administrators v. SinnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Kelsh v. JaegerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API