Legal Opinion

Burke v. O'Connor

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1967PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthew J. Jasen, J.

This article 78 proceeding is brought (1) to compel the issuance of a building permit to operate a restaurant; (2) to review the determination of the East Aurora Zoning Board of Appeals in affirming the denial of a building permit by the Building Inspector of said village; and (3) in the alternative, to review the determination of the aforesaid board in refusing to grant a variance to the petitioner.

The facts upon which this proceeding is based are as follows:

It appears that for many years there was maintained upon the property which is the subject of this proceeding, an inn and restaurant.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of 440 E. 102nd St. Corp. v. MurdockNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. Incorporated Village of Brookville v. Paulgene Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1960

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ben Lomond, Inc. v. City of Idaho FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Vitolo v. ChaveNew York Supreme Court · 1970
  3. In re the Estate of McLaughlinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1970
  4. Meyer v. Warminster Township Zoning Hearing Board, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1971
  5. Ben Lomond, Inc. v. City of Idaho FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API