Meyer v. Warminster Township Zoning Hearing Board
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County
1Opinion of the Court
SATTERTHWAITE, P. J.,
The problem in this zoning case is one of construction and validity of certain provisions of the Warminster Township ordinance pertaining to restaurants. Would the proposed Carrolls limited menu, rapid service enterprise be a conventional type of restaurant permitted under the applicable C commercial zoning classification of the subject premises; or, as the Warminster Zoning Hearing Board found, would it be rather a drive-in type of restaurant, which is permitted only in HC commercial districts and, if properly characterized as in the latter category, is the distinction…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ben Lomond, Inc. v. City of Idaho FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
- Gino's of Maryland, Inc. v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- Food Corp. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Morris v. PostmaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- Frost v. Village of Glen EllynIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re Appeal of HaffCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982