Legal Opinion
Dretzka v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided October 9, 1934PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.
The principal question raised here is whether or not the defendant failed in the performance of any duty which it owed Dretzka. In submitting the question of negligence to the jury, after defining negligence, the trial court further instructed the jury:
“You are instructed that the employees of the railway company in charge of the locomotive are required to exercise ordinary care to keep a proper lookout as to the track and intersecting streets and highways to avoid collision with persons or vehicles, and to observe the streets and highways adjacent to the tracks sufficiently to enable them to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. SaxonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Kawacz v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
3Cited by10 opinions
- Galicich v. Oregon Short Line R.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1939
- Keegan v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
- De Wildt v. ThomsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
- Hynek v. Kewaunee, Green Bay & Western Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
- Lind v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.