Legal Opinion

Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Nixon

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 24, 1926No. 306PublishedCited by 109 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes

delivered the opinion of the Court. ■

" > This is a suit to recover damages for the death of the .plaintiff’s husband, the intestate, from the Railroad Company upoii. whose tracks the death occurred. The plaintiff, "(the respondent here,) obtained a. verdict arid judgment in the trial Court and upon a writ of error the judgment was .affirmed by the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia. 140 Va. 351. As the recovery was based- upon the Employers’ Liability -Act of April 22, 1908, c. 149, § 1, 35 Stat. 65, the death having occurred in interstate commerce, a writ of certiorari was granted by this…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Aerkfetz v. HumphreysSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Boldt v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Connelley v. Pennsylvania R.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1912
  4. Pennsylvania Railroad v. WachterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
  5. Davis v. Philadelphia & R. Ry. Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by109 opinions

  1. Toledo, St. Louis & Western Railroad v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Joice v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
  3. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. MihasSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Rocco v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. McGivern v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942

104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API