State v. Freeman
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GRANT, Judge.
The issue raised in this appeal is whether the trial court erred by not permitting appellant, Charles Michael Freeman (“defendant”), to keep merchandise that he admitted stealing from various credit merchants, subject to his payment of restitution, if the merchants did not reclaim it. For reasons stated below, we find that the trial court did not err. However, because we find the order of restitution imposed in the plea agreement in this case is improper, for reasons also stated below we vacate that order and remand to the trial court for reimposition of restitution only.
FA…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. IniguezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- State v. MerrillCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- State v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- State v. ScrogginsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- State v. SteffyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. MannArizona Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. ContrerasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- Matter of Estate of VigliottoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
- State of Arizona v. Reuben Renee CotaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- State v. MannArizona Supreme Court · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.