Legal Opinion

State v. Contreras

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 17, 1994No. 1 CA-CR 92-1857PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EHRLICH, Judge.

Joseph Michael Contreras (“defendant”) pled guilty to first-degree criminal trespass, a class 6 undesignated offense, for which two years of probation were ordered. He has appealed from the trial court’s later modification of the terms of probation to add a condition that he pay restitution to the victims of his crime. The sole issue presented is *452whether a trial court may modify a defendant’s conditions of probation to impose restitution after probation has been ordered and in the absence of any grounds supporting its revocation. For the reasons which follow, we affirm…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. IniguezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  2. State v. FoyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  3. Burton v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  4. State v. SteffyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  5. State v. BowlesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In Re Alton D.Arizona Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In Re Frank H.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  3. State v. SanchezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  4. State v. RayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  5. State v. NeeseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API