Legal Opinion
Peralta v. Cendant Corp.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided September 29, 2000No. 3:98cv1452 (JBA)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
[DOC. #45]
ARTERTON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Ramon Peralta (“Peralta”) has sued his former employer, Cendant Corporation (“Cendant”) for race and gender discrimination in violation of Title VII, and various state law claims. Cendant now moves for summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [doc. # 45] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Viewing the record in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, the factual background to this case is as follows. On October 16, 1995, Defendant Cendant Corporation 1…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Winston v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bustillos v. Board of County CommissionersDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2016
- Bagley v. Yale UniversityDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
- Byra-Grzegorczyk v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
- Salazar v. City of AlbuquerqueDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2011
- Pecoraro v. New Haven RegisterDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.