Legal Opinion

Melchior v. Apfel

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided July 27, 1998No. 6:97-cv-00548PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER

HURD, United States Magistrate Judge.

This matter is brought pursuant to §§ 205(g) & 1631(b)(3) of the Social Security Act (“Act”), as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) & 1383(c)(3), to review a final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”), denying the plaintiffs claim of Supplemental Security Income. The parties have filed their briefs, including the Administrative Record on Appeal, and the matter has been submitted to this court without oral argument.

I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On September 19, 1994, the plaintiff filed an application for…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Sullivan v. ZebleySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Elmer G. Berry v. Richard Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  5. George MONGEUR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Correale-Englehart v. AstrueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  2. Saxon v. AstrueDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2011
  3. Hamedallah ex rel. E.B. v. AstrueDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2012
  4. Pidkaminy v. AstrueDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2013
  5. Gallivan v. ApfelDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API