Legal Opinion
Pidkaminy v. Astrue
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided January 22, 2013No. 5:11-CV-865 (FJS)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
SCULLIN, Senior District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Randy J. Pidkaminy brought this action pursuant to the Social Security Act (the “Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3), seeking review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s final decision denying his application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”). See Dkt. No. 1.
Currently before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for judgment on the pleadings.
II. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff protectively filed his SSI application with the Social Security Administration on July 25, 2008. See Administrative Record…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ysabel Rosa v. John S. Callahan, Acting Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Rita Schaal v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security, 1 Dockets 96-6212, 96-6316Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Burgess v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Heckler v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bresett v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2020
- Chase v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2020
- Chrzanowski v. SaulDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
- Hagopian v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2023
- McClanahan v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.