Budget Finance Plan v. Sav-On Food Club, Inc.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.
Plaintiff, the assignee of contracts of conditional sale, brought these two actions for money against the assignor-seller, herein called defendant. The actions were tried together. In the first action, referred to by the parties as the “with recourse assignment” case, the parties stipulated that plaintiff have judgment in specified sums on the first and second causes of action and that the sums due on the third and fourth causes of action had been paid in full; plaintiff appeals from the portion of the judgment which decrees that it take nothing on its fifth cause of action. In the second…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pitzer v. WedelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Adams v. AnthonyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- James v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Ravizza v. Budd & Quinn, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1942
- American-LaFrance Fire Engine Co. v. BaggeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
3Cited by8 opinions
- Matthews v. HintonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Overholser v. GlynnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Anderson v. HiattCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Howard Townsite Owners, Inc. v. MillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Construction MacHinery Co. v. Willard & Rodman, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.