Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Hiatt
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 17, 1960No. Civ. 9805PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchottky, J.
This is an appeal by Prank E. Hiatt, Naoma M. Hiatt and Prank Hiatt Logging Company from a judgment awarding Norman Anderson recovery of $3,226.22 as the principal sum due on a promissory note, plus interest and $400 attorney’s fees.
In June, 1956, the Hiatts purchased a log loader known as a Pettibone Cary-Lift from Norman Anderson, doing business as the Shasta Machinery Sales. The total purchase price was $16,742.65 according to the sales invoice. The transaction was financed and the conditional sales contract read in part as
follows:
“1. Cash Selling Price.....................$16,714.15
2.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cirimele v. ShinazyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Hahn v. HahnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- West Virginia MacK Sales Co. v. BrownWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1954
- Franz v. HairUtah Supreme Court · 1930
- Budget Finance Plan v. Sav-On Food Club, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Vaughn v. VaughnIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
- Rio Vista Gas Assn. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- D. N. & E. Walter & Co. v. Efficient Investments, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968