Legal Opinion

Adams v. Anthony

California Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1918No. L. A. No. 4204. Department OnePublishedCited by 9 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. E. W. Freeman, A. D. Laughlin, and Paul Nourse, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

The defendant appeals from a judgment declaring that plaintiff is entitled to the possession of a certain automobile truck. ,

On June 15, 1914, the parties entered into a written agreement concerning the truck, which was then the property of the defendant. By the terms of the writing, Anthony leased the truck to Adams for the term of twelve months, for a rental of $3,785, of which $1,200 was paid at the time, and • the balance was made payable in monthly installments, for which Adams gave his promissory notes. It was stipulated that in default in payment of any of the rental, the lessor might…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Muncy v. BrainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Shikany v. Salt Creek Transp. Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Silverstin v. Kohler & ChaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Budget Finance Plan v. Sav-On Food Club, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Covington v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. Rudolph Wurlitzer Co. v. Mandarin Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API