Klassette v. Liggett Drug Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, J.
The situation here is not unlike those in the cases of Houston v. Monroe, 213 N. C., 788, 197 S. E., 571, and Watkins v. Raleigh, 214 N. C., 644, 200 S. E., 424, wherein this Court held that demurrer to the evidence was sustainable “if not upon the principal question of liability, then upon the ground of contributory negligence.”
We are of opinion, however, that the evidence shown in the record on this appeal taken in the light most favorable to plaintiff, as the Court does in passing upon an exception to a judgment as of nonsuit, fails to make.out a ease of actionable negligence, in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Murray v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Mills v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Mills v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Mitchell v. . MeltsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Whitt v. . RandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Ayres v. Indian Heights Volunteer Fire Department, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1986
- Rhodes v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Sides v. Cabarrus Memorial Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- McKinney v. City of High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Parker v. Town of ErwinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.