Legal Opinion

N.J. National Bank, C., Co. v. Wolf

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided June 19, 1931PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Complainants move that defendants be enjoined from collecting the rents of the mortgaged premises and from interfering with complainants' collection thereof, and that the tenants be restrained from paying the rents to anyone except complainants and that the tenants be ordered to pay their rents to complainants pending the suit. Complainants hold two mortgages, each encumbering a twenty-one family apartment house. Each mortgage contains this provision —

"That in the event of any default in any covenant in said bond contained, said mortgagee may enter, take possession of the mortgaged premises…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Paramount B. L. v. SacksNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
  2. Stanton v. Metropolitan Lumber Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
  3. Feigenspan v. NizolekNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1906
  4. Bryan v. BryanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1896

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re Jason Realty, L.P., Debtor. First Fidelity Bank, N.A. v. Jason Realty, L.P., Jason Realty, L.P. v. First Fidelity Bank, N.ACourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  2. Midlantic National Bank v. SourlisDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
  3. In Re Pine Lake Village Apartment Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  4. Berman v. One Forty-Five Belmont Ave. Corp.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931
  5. In Re Ocean Place Development, LLC.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API