Legal Opinion
Paramount B. L. v. Sacks
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided December 5, 1930PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The contest is by three mortgagees each of which claims to be entitled to rents of mortgaged premises for the months of December, 1929, and January, 1930, collected by the receiver appointed in foreclosure proceedings at the suit of the first mortgagee on January 7th, 1930.
The bill to foreclose was filed December 26th, 1929. The complainant's mortgage contained an assignment of rents conditioned upon default and effective as of the date of the filing of the bill to foreclose. The second mortgage, now held by the defendant Stein, contained an assignment of the rents effective upon default. The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Freedman's Saving & Trust Co. v. ShepherdSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Teal v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Sage v. Memphis & Little Rock RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Grant v. Phœnix Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Dow v. Memphis & Little Rock RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Kinnison v. Guaranty Liquidating Corp.California Supreme Court · 1941
- In Re Jason Realty, L.P., Debtor. First Fidelity Bank, N.A. v. Jason Realty, L.P., Jason Realty, L.P. v. First Fidelity Bank, N.ACourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Ventura-Louise Properties v. RothmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Childs Real Estate Co. v. Shelburne Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
- Associated Co. v. GreenhutCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1933
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.