Legal Opinion

Bryan v. Bryan

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided January 3, 1896PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On final hearing on pleadings and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

Pitney, Y. C.

The bill has a twofold aspect and object:

First. It is a bill by three tenants in common against a fourth and his mortgagee for a partition of certain lands, the title to which the tenants derived by devise from their father, John Bryan the elder. As to this part of the case there is no room for dispute. There is none as to the title, and the right, to partition is clear.

Second. The bill shows, and it is proven, that certain portions of the lands so derived from their ancestor have been sold for full consideration to divers purchasers, and conveyed by deeds containing full…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sherman v. FitchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  2. Clouston v. ShearerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  3. Ward v. . DeweyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Vandalia Coal Co. v. LawsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909
  2. N.J. National Bank, C., Co. v. WolfNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931
  3. Briggs v. FaulknerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
  4. Trafton v. BainbridgeNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API