Legal Opinion

Berman v. One Forty-Five Belmont Ave. Corp.

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 29, 1931PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

There are three claimants to the fund: the complainant, second mortgagee; the National Commercial Title Mortgage Guaranty Company, first mortgagee, and Arthur G. Teweles, the vendor named in a conditional sales contract covering electric refrigerators installed in the mortgaged premises. The last two named were not parties to this cause until the question of distribution arose, when they were admitted so that their claims might be heard.

Shortly after the receiver was appointed, Mr. Teweles petitioned the court to instruct the receiver to permit the removal of the refrigerating equipment or…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. . RossonNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Ranney v. PeyserNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  3. Paramount B. L. v. SacksNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
  4. Stanton v. Metropolitan Lumber Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
  5. Bk. of America v. La Reine Hotel Corp.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Arthur Earl McKnight v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
  2. EA Coronis Assocs. v. M. Gordon Constr. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
  3. In Re RothenbergNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1945
  4. South Amboy Trust Co. v. McMichael Holdings, Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
  5. Baader v. MascellinoNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API