Utter v. Building Industry Ass'n
Washington Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMadsen, C.J.
¶73 (concurring/dissenting) — I agree with the majority that the attorney general’s (AG) referral of the *436plaintiff’s complaint to the Public Disclosure Commission (PDC) did not “commence an action” within the meaning of the citizen suit statute, RCW 42.17A.765(4). Nevertheless, in my view, neither reversal of summary judgment nor further proceedings are warranted in this case because the AG’s commencement of a lawsuit against Building Industry Association of Washington’s (BIAW) nonprofit arm precludes a further citizen suit against BIAW under RCW 42.17A.765(4)(a)(i) and because the PDC’s…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Pud No. 1 of Jefferson County v. Washington Department of EcologySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Port of Seattle v. Pollution Control Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Hillis v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Hillis v. State, Dept. of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.