Legal Opinion

United States v. Lobue

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided November 20, 1990No. 90 CR 726PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

CONLON, District Judge.

Defendants Nick Lobue and Donald Pris-co were indicted for criminal violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1962(c) and (d); extortion in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1951; and tax violations under 26 U.S.C. § 7206(1). Lobue and Prisco move to dismiss the RICO charges (counts I and II) on the ground that RICO is unconstitutionally vague. In addition, Lobue and Prisco move for a bill of particulars, for immediate disclosure of all evidence favorable to them, and for an order requiring the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. EisenbergDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1991
  2. United States v. QuintanillaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
  3. United States v. MarianiDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. United States v. BalogunDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
  5. United States v. EstevesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API