Legal Opinion

United States v. Quintanilla

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 4, 1991No. 90 CR 772PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

CONLON, District Judge.

Stripped of pleading intricacies, this case basically involves an alleged scheme by a former G. Heileman Brewing Company employee and two other persons to defraud the company of over $700,000. In a forty-count “First Superseding Indictment” (“the indictment”), defendants Carlos Quintanil-la, Joseph Monreal and Leticia Gutierrez are charged with a barrage of offenses arising from essentially the same alleged course of conduct, including violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”); mail and wire fraud;…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Carlos Quintanilla and Leticia GutierrezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. KennedyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1993
  3. United States v. AilsworthDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1994
  4. United States v. SimsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
  5. United States v. HolveckDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API