Legal Opinion

United States v. Mariani

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 17, 1998No. 3:CR-97-225PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

VANASKIE, District Judge.

The defendants have moved, both collectively and individually, to compel discovery of certain evidence in the government’s possession, such as witness statements that may contain exculpatory information or which may be used to cross-examine government witnesses at time of trial. The government, contending that it has properly met its discovery obligations at this time, states that it will produce the documents defendants seek one week prior to trial. Thus, the government is not contending that it lacks an obligation to turn over certain material; instead,…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. MarianiDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. United States v. MoyerDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. United States v. Bravo-FernándezDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2017
  4. United States v. WelchDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API