Legal Opinion

United States v. Eisenberg

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided July 26, 1991No. Crim. 89-218PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LECHNER, District Judge.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Facts....................................................................... 672

Discussion.................................................................. 680

I. Discovery-Related and Miscellaneous Motions..................... 680

A. Motion for Statements of Co-Conspirators.................... 680

B. Motion for List of Government Witnesses .................... 683

C. Motion for Giglio Material................................... 684

D. Motions for Disclosure of Rule 404 Evidence the Government Intends to…

2Cases cited189 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

184 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. United States v. Richard O. BertoliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  2. Securities Exchange Commission v. Monarch Funding Corporation, Leo M. Eisenberg, Steven R. Cloyes, and Richard M. Cannistraro, Richard O. BertoliCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. BertoliDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
  4. United States v. GiampaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
  5. United States v. JacksonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1994

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API