Legal Opinion
Coalition for Safe Power v. Oregon Public Utility Commission
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided February 28, 1996No. A8404-02380; CA A81523 (Control); A8605-02998; CA A82488; A8804-01802; CA A82489; A8505-3006; CA A82882PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.
Forelaws on Board and Utility Reform Project appeal from the trial court’s dismissal, for lack of jurisdiction, of these consolidated cases seeking review of various Public Utility Commission (PUC) orders on rate changes that were sought by respondent Pacific Power & Light Company (PP&L). We affirm.
ORS 756.580(2) provides that suits like those in question
“may be commenced by any party so aggrieved in the Circuit Court for Marion County, in the circuit court for the county in which any hearing has been held in the proceeding in which the order was made, or in the circuit court for the county…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. KingOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Dickinson v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Saif Corp. v. AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- State of Oregon v. ElliottOregon Supreme Court · 1954
- Anderson v. Heltzel, Pub. Util. Comm.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Neff v. Jackson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- Coalition for Safe Power v. Oregon Public Utility CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Michels v. HodgesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Michels v. HodgesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997