Legal Opinion

State of Oregon v. Elliott

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1954PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLatourette, C. J.

Dr. Ross H. Elliott, a chiropractor, was convicted and sentenced for the violation of § 23-927, OCLA (ORS 161.310), previously referred to by this Court as the Oregon Nuisance Act, it being charged that he and another unlawfully kept and maintained an office for the purpose of producing abortions. The appeal comes to us on a demurrer to the indictment, which indictment follows:

“Dr. Ross H. Elliott, and Jane Doe, whose true name is unknown are accused by the Grand Jury of the county of Multnomah and State of Oregon, by this indictment of the crime of committing an act grossly disturbing the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jordan v. De GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. State v. LaundyOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  3. State v. AnthonyOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  4. State of Oregon v. BuckOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  5. State v. WaymireOregon Supreme Court · 1908

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. SpencerOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Farmers Ins. Co. of Oregon v. MowryOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State of Oregon v. DeweyOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  5. State v. ClevengerOregon Supreme Court · 1984

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API