Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Heltzel, Pub. Util. Comm.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1952PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

Prior to November 15,1951, plaintiff was the holder of a permit issued by the public utilities commissioner of Oregon to operate as a common carrier by motor vehicle of property anywhere for hire in irregular route service “within and from and to 50 road miles of Merrill, Oregon”. On that day the defendant commissioner, after a hearing in Klamath Falls, Klamath County, Oregon, at which the plaintiff was represented by counsel, entered an order restricting such permit. This was done, according to the recitals of the order, pursuant to authority (granted the commissioner in § 10, ch 488, Oregon…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. PrestonOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Earle v. HolmanOregon Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. RoderickIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Matanuska-Susitna Borough v. LumAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Martinez v. CoxNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co. v. EachusOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Coalition for Safe Power v. Oregon Public Utility CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API