Legal Opinion

Hardy & Hardy v. Wills

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1998No. 25369PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Respondent John Wills retained the law firm of Hardy & Hardy in June 1991 to help him recover workers’ compensation benefits for a job-related injury. Wills agreed to pay the firm 25% of the gross amount recovered, unless he terminated the representation before recovering benefits or receiving or accepting a settlement offer. In the event that Wills terminated the representation before recovering benefits or receiving or accepting a settlement offer, he agreed to pay for all services rendered at the firm’s prevailing hourly rate plus out-of-pocket costs.

In September 1991, Wills was…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McKay v. Board of Sup'rs of Carson CityNevada Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Nyberg v. Nevada Industrial CommissionNevada Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Billingslea v. TartellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. McCabe v. FeeOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Dunseath v. Nevada Industrial CommissionNevada Supreme Court · 1929

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bero-Wachs v. Law Office of Logar & PulverNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Decker & Mattison Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API