Hardy & Hardy v. Wills
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Respondent John Wills retained the law firm of Hardy & Hardy in June 1991 to help him recover workers’ compensation benefits for a job-related injury. Wills agreed to pay the firm 25% of the gross amount recovered, unless he terminated the representation before recovering benefits or receiving or accepting a settlement offer. In the event that Wills terminated the representation before recovering benefits or receiving or accepting a settlement offer, he agreed to pay for all services rendered at the firm’s prevailing hourly rate plus out-of-pocket costs.
In September 1991, Wills was…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- McKay v. Board of Sup'rs of Carson CityNevada Supreme Court · 1986
- Nyberg v. Nevada Industrial CommissionNevada Supreme Court · 1984
- Billingslea v. TartellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1945
- McCabe v. FeeOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Dunseath v. Nevada Industrial CommissionNevada Supreme Court · 1929
4Cited by2 opinions
- Bero-Wachs v. Law Office of Logar & PulverNevada Supreme Court · 2007
- Decker & Mattison Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002