Legal Opinion

McCabe v. Fee

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1977No. 76-4230, SC 25000PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBryson, J.

This case is before us on the allegations of the complaint. Plaintiff alleged, in effect, that he received a compensation award for a job-related injury, that he deposited the proceeds in a bank, that defendants had a writ of attachment and notice of garnishment served on the bank, and that defendants then obtained possession of the money and have refused to return it. The complaint alleges that workmen’s compensation is exempt from attachment and garnishment and prays for return of the amount seized and for punitive damages.

Defendants demurred to plaintiff’s complaint on the ground it failed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schulz v. State Compensation DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 1968

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Broward v. Jacksonville Medical CenterSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
  2. Matthews v. LewisKentucky Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Waldman v. Nolen (In Re Nolen)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 1986
  4. Decker & Mattison Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  5. In Re CoveyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API