Dunseath v. Nevada Industrial Commission
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Does public policy require and the Nevada industrial insurance act by specific provision provide that no claimant for compensation shall contract with an attorney to represent the former in an action at law for the recovery of compensation after a claim has been finally rejected by the Nevada industrial commission? We think the answer is no, for the following reasons:
When once the Nevada industrial commission has rejected a claim, finally and in toto, the claimant has concluded so far as the Nevada industrial commission is concerned. State v. Nevada Industrial Commission, 40 Nev. 220. This…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Calhoun v. MassieSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Nutt v. KnutSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Yeiser v. DysartSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Brearley School, Ltd. v. WardNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- State ex rel. Brown v. Nevada Industrial CommissionNevada Supreme Court · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mello v. WoodhouseNevada Supreme Court · 1994
- Bero-Wachs v. Law Office of Logar & PulverNevada Supreme Court · 2007
- English v. McCorkleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Hardy & Hardy v. WillsNevada Supreme Court · 1998
- Bacciglieri v. GhezziDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1946