Legal Opinion
McNickels v. Richmond Unified School District
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 15, 1970No. Civ. No. 27070PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BROWN (H. C.), J.
The appellants are three school teachers who claim their employer, the Richmond School District, made wrongful deductions *1211from their salaries for absences while on strike. It is conceded that their absences were unauthorized and that deductions for unauthorized absences are proper. Appellants contend, however, that the trial court erred in failing to order the district to use the formula prescribed in Education Code section 13520 in making those deductions.
The facts are not disputed. The appellants are employed as teachers by the respondent school district. During the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1908
- Riebe v. Budget Financial Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Redevelopment Agency v. MalakiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Cranston v. WymanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ruggiero v. Los Angeles City Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Lakeside Federation of Teachers, Local 2358 v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977