Legal Opinion

Riebe v. Budget Financial Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 1, 1968No. Civ. 31391; Civ. 31392PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Joseph R. Laird for Plaintiffs, Cross-defendants and Appellants.

1Opinion of the CourtMoss, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from judgments on the pleadings rendered in favor of defendant and cross-complainant Budget Financial Corporation (“Budget”). In this opinion we consider whether a loan made by a personal property broker to a home builder is void as usurious because the security upon which the lender relied consists of notes secured by deeds of trust which represent a portion of the purchase price of homes sold by the borrower. The complaints allege: On August 1, 1963, Budget, a licensed personal property broker, made a loan to plaintiffs Moody-McCloud, et al., (“the borrowers”) of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Carter v. Seaboard Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Ex Parte GoodrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. People ex rel. Farnum v. San Francisco Savings UnionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Wolf v. Pacific Southwest Discount Corp.California Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Eaker v. BryantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. West Pico Furniture Co. v. Pacific Finance LoansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. In the Matter of Bristol Associates, Inc., Debtor. Appeal of Girard Trust BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
  3. Black v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. TRIPLE a MANAGEMENT CO. v. FrisoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. Hutchins v. WatersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API