Legal Opinion

Ruggiero v. Los Angeles City Unified School District

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 16, 1973No. Civ. 40869PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DUNN, J.

In a class action, petitioners sought the issuance of a writ of mandate to require respondents to compensate them in individually minor sums. Respondents’ return to the petition denied most of its material allegations and pleaded various affirmative defenses including petitioners’ fail ure to file a timely claim; respondents also pleaded six counterclaims. The trial court’s judgment denied issuance of the writ, its conclusions of law stating the petition for the writ is barred by the claims statute appearing in board of education rule 1206 and Government Code section 900 et…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Hunter v. SparlingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Fry v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Myers v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Falk v. FalkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Loehr v. Ventura County Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  2. Adler v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. James v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Geiger v. United States Department of JusticeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API